След приемането на България за член на Съвета на Европа на 7 май 1992г. , от 1994 до 2000г. над страната ни се проведе мониторинг от Парламентарната Асамблея на Съвета на Европа (ПАСЕ) целящ да установи дали България изпълнява задълженията си поети при приемането в организацията.
Той приключи през януари 2000г.
От тогава до сега в продължение на 26 години ПАСЕ остана в пост-монторингов диалог с България повече от 25 години по определени теми, чието развитие се следеше.
Този пост-мониторингов диалог приключи с приемане на Резолюция от Асамблеята на 1 октомври 2025г.
За прекратяването гласуваха 101 депутати в ПАСЕ, против бяха трима (и тримата от Република Северна Македония) и един се въздържа (от България).
С това ПАСЕ прие, че България е изпълнила поетите ангажименти към Съвета на Европа.
Към проекта за резолюция бяха внесени три предложения за поправки от делегацията на Република Северна Македония и някои други, които не бяха подложени на гласуване, поради отхвърлянето им от комисията с монозинство от повече от 2/3. (вижте текстовете на предложените поправки по-долу).
След тях една продложение за поправка внесе и българската делегация. То беше оттеглено в полза на компромисни поправки внесени от докладчика Круштен.
В резултат от внесената поправка в чл.14, отпадна терминът "етнически македонци" и беше заместен с термина "лица с македонско самосъзнание".
Вижте в стенограмата по-долу.
От тук нататък България ще продължи, като равноправен член на Съвета на Европа да сътрудничи активно и искрено за постигане на целите на тази най-стара пан-европейска организация.
Post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria
Resolution 2620 (2025)
https://pace.coe.int/en/files/35683/html
- Author(s):
- Parliamentary Assembly
- Origin
- Assembly debate on 1 October 2025 (33rd sitting) (see Doc. 16246, report of the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee), co-rapporteurs: Ms Deborah Bergamini and Mr Yves Cruchten). Text adopted by the Assembly on 1 October 2025 (33rd sitting).Provisional version subject to editorial review.
1. Bulgaria joined the Council of Europe in 1992. Until 2000, it was subject to the full monitoring procedure. By means of Resolution 1211 (2000), the Parliamentary Assembly decided to close the full monitoring procedure and open a post-monitoring dialogue on a number of outstanding concerns arising from non-fulfilment of Bulgaria’s commitments entered into upon accession and obligations incumbent upon every member State under Article 3 of the Statute of the Council of Europe (ETS No. 1) with regard to democracy, the rule of law and human rights. Since 2000, the progress in addressing these outstanding concerns has been systematically assessed by the Assembly.
2. The Assembly refers to its most recent resolution on post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria, namely Resolution 2296 (2019) in which it recognised the unquestionable progress achieved in terms of the crucial reforms and legislative framework put in place. However, it resolved not to close the post-monitoring dialogue until remaining issues in the areas of judiciary, fight against high-level corruption, media, human rights of minorities, combating hate speech and violence against women are addressed, with a view to ensuring sustainability and irreversibility of reforms.
3. Bulgaria should be commended for having overcome the political crisis and instability illustrated by seven consecutive early parliamentary elections held on 4 April 2021, 11 July 2021, 14 November 2021 (on the day of the presidential election), 2 October 2022, 2 April 2023, 9 June 2024 and 27 October 2024.
4. The Assembly welcomes the establishment of a coalition government in January 2025 and its demonstrated sustained political will and commitment to fully honour the commitments and obligations reflected in Resolution 2296 (2019) as confirmed by its continued co-operation with Council of Europe monitoring mechanisms including the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) of the Assembly and the European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission).
5. The Assembly recalls that, on 20 December 2023, the parliament adopted constitutional amendments, which addressed some long-standing concerns of the Venice Commission and the Assembly with regard to the system of governance of the judiciary and of the prosecution service.
6. The Assembly takes note of the ruling of the Constitutional Court of 26 July 2024 (No. 13), which declared unconstitutional most of these constitutional amendments and stated that their adoption required a Grand National Assembly and not an ordinary parliament. Consequently, the reform of the Supreme Judicial Council was not pursued, which is to be regretted.
7. The Assembly welcomes the reform of the Criminal Procedure Code of 26 May 2023, which established a mechanism for the accountability and criminal liability of the Prosecutor General and his/her deputies. Following this reform, prosecutors’ decisions not to open investigations into certain categories of criminal offences (including corruption related offences) can be subject to judicial review. The Assembly notes with satisfaction that the Constitutional Court confirmed the constitutionality of these legislative amendments (ruling No. 14 of 26 July 2024). It also welcomes the fact that the same court confirmed the constitutionality of the constitutional amendments of 20 December 2023 limiting the excessive powers of the Prosecutor’s Office (ruling No. 13 of 26 July 2024). All these developments are in line with Venice Commission’s recommendations.
8. While the above legislative and constitutional changes constitute, overall, considerable progress in the accomplishment of Bulgaria’s commitments and obligations, it should be regretted that not all issues with regard to the judicial system have yet been addressed. In particular, the five-year probationary period for judges has been retained. Moreover, the broad and vaguely defined role of the Inspectorate of the Judiciary and the lack of safeguards which would prevent interference with the substance of the courts’ decision making, are a matter of concern.
9. The Assembly welcomes the measures undertaken by the Bulgarian authorities with a view to combating high-level corruption. It welcomes the adoption, on 6 October 2023, of the Anti-Corruption Act, which introduced a new structure and new powers for the Commission for Counteracting Corruption and the Commission for Illegal Assets Forfeiture, in particular the power to investigate corruption offences committed by persons holding public positions. The lack of this power was one of the main weaknesses of the former Anti-Corruption Commission.
10. The Assembly notes with satisfaction the adoption, on 27 January 2023, of the long-awaited Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers or Persons Publicly Disclosing Information about Violations, which provides for a comprehensive and streamlined legal framework for reporting and whistle-blower protection in compliance with democratic standards. The amendments to the Law on Public Procurement, aimed at ensuring more transparency, mark further progress. Moreover, the Assembly notes the ongoing work on new legislation in the areas of lobbying and foreign bribery.
11. The Assembly takes note of the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) Second Compliance report on Bulgaria of January 2020, assessing the implementation of the recommendations of the Fourth Evaluation Round on the prevention of corruption in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors, which concluded that out of 19 recommendations, Bulgaria has implemented 16, and that the three remaining recommendations have been partly implemented.
12. The Assembly refers to GRECO’s Fifth Evaluation Round report on Bulgaria on preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement authorities, in which it formulated 28 recommendations. In November 2024, GRECO concluded that only seven recommendations had been implemented satisfactorily (mainly those concerning the integrity of police), eleven had been partly implemented and ten had not been implemented. The Assembly urges the Bulgarian authorities to fully and rapidly implement GRECO’s recommendations included in the fourth and fifth evaluation Rounds.
13. Despite some high-level corruption scandals in the country, a solid track-record of final convictions in high-level corruption cases continues to be lacking in Bulgaria to date. In 2023, Bulgarian political figures were sanctioned in third countries in cases related to high-level corruption after the judicial proceedings against them had been halted in Bulgaria. The Assembly expects that the effectiveness of the newly introduced anti-corruption measures will be demonstrated through a better track-record of final convictions in high-level corruption cases.
14. Over 90 leading judgments of the European Court of Human Rights concerning Bulgaria are pending implementation, with around one third of them pending for at least 10 years. The Assembly calls on the authorities to continue to co-operate with the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe with a view to making tangible progress in the execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, in particular as regards cases concerning the reform of the judiciary (S.Z. v. Bulgaria, Kolevi v. Bulgaria and Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria), forced evictions and demolition of houses of Roma (Yordanova and Others v. Bulgaria) and refusals to register associations of persons asserting a Macedonian ethnic consciousness (UMO Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria and similar cases).
15. The Assembly notes with satisfaction that Bulgaria has considerably improved its framework as regards freedom of expression. A number of positive developments should be noted, including amendments to the Criminal Code providing for better protection of journalists in cases of alleged of defamation with regard to public officials, adopted in July 2023. The alleviation of criminal liability has addressed a long-standing recommendation of the Council of Europe. A major improvement in the jurisprudence of national courts with regard to defamation charges against journalists in application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights should be acknowledged.
16. Regrettably, persisting problems include high levels of media concentration, and a lack of transparency in media ownership, distribution and media providers and an important number of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) targeting journalists. The Assembly calls on the Bulgarian authorities to introduce legislative measures addressing these concerns.
17. The Assembly remains concerned about the fragile situation of the Roma population which is the largest minority group and constitutes almost 5% of the population in Bulgaria. While a number of programmes, strategies and action plans have been designed and implemented in recent years to improve the situation of Roma, no significant progress has been noted, and reports relating to the employment, housing, material situation, education and health of the Roma population continue to be alarming. The Assembly urges the Bulgarian authorities to pursue their efforts in order to achieve tangible progress in the integration and inclusion of the Roma population.
18. The Assembly notes with satisfaction that a number of measures have been taken to combat hate speech. The latest amendments to the Criminal Code adopted in July 2023 provide for a more extensive definition of hate speech and crime, and for more severe punishment for these offences. National campaigns and training have considerably contributed to increasing public and professional awareness.
19. The Assembly recognises the considerable progress achieved with regard to combating violence against women. It commends Bulgaria in particular for the adoption, in July 2023, of the amendments to the Law on Protection from Domestic Violence, which cover the protection of victims of domestic violence from an early stage, irrespective of the legal status of their relationship. Furthermore, the amendments to the Law on Protection from Domestic Violence adopted in August 2023 give additional rights to the victims. At the same time, the Assembly urges the Bulgarian authorities to increase budgetary resources for shelters for victims of domestic violence.
20. While the overall progress in the fulfilment of Bulgaria’s commitments and obligations is not questioned, some remaining shortcomings still require remedy. The Assembly calls on the Bulgarian authorities to resume the reform of the organisation of the State (which was stopped following the ruling of the Constitutional Court of 26 July 2024 (No. 13)), through the adoption of ordinary legislation and/or new constitutional amendments by the Grand National Assembly. It also invites the authorities to address other outstanding issues in close co-operation with the Committee of Ministers, the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, the Venice Commission and other Council of Europe bodies.
21. The Assembly recalls that all successive early parliamentary elections in 2021-2024 were observed by its ad hoc committees for the observation of elections. The legal framework was adequate for the conduct of democratic elections and fundamental freedoms were respected. Overall, the consecutive elections were considered to be competitive and well managed by the election administration.
22. The Assembly notes that, in September 2023, the European Commission terminated the Co-operation and Verification Mechanism in respect of Bulgaria, following the satisfactory fulfilment of all the benchmarks and recommendations under this mechanism in the field of the judiciary, fight against corruption and organised crime. It also welcomes the decisions of the relevant European Union institutions on Bulgaria’s accession to the Eurozone as of 1 January 2026.
23. Against this background, the Assembly resolves to close the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria and follow the developments in the country with regard to the rule of law, pluralist democracy and human rights in the framework of its periodic reviews.
Sitting no. 33 - Wednesday afternoon 01 October 2025
Debate
- Post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria
Speakers on behalf of group
| EPP/CD | Mr Ionuț-Marian STROE | Romania | |
| ECPA | Ms Atidzhe ALIEVA-VELI | Bulgaria | |
| ALDE | Mr Mehmet AKALIN | Türkiye | |
| UEL | Mr George LOUCAIDES | Cyprus | |
| SOC | Mr Stefan SCHENNACH | Austria |
Speakers list
| 1 | SOC | Ms Bisera KOSTADINOVSKA-STOJCHEVSKA | North Macedonia |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | EPP/CD | Ms Denitsa SACHEVA | Bulgaria |
| 3 | SOC | Mr Didier MARIE | France |
| 4 | EPP/CD | Ms Marija PETRUSHEVSKA | North Macedonia |
| 5 | NR | Ms Nadejda IORDANOVA | Bulgaria |
Стенограма :
Verbatim
https://pace.coe.int/en/verbatim/2025-10-01/pm/en
Opening of sitting No 33
(…..)
Debate: Post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria
Mr Andries GRYFFROY
Belgium, ALDE, President of the Assembly
Debate: Post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria
Mr Andries GRYFFROY
Belgium, ALDE, President of the Assembly
17:57:32
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Can I ask the rapporteur for the next debate to come down, so that we don't lose too much time, because this is also very tight on time. I'm sorry that I have to hurry up a little bit.
So, Mr Yves CRUCHTEN and I also see the Vice-Chair. Sorry, the Chairperson of the Committee is also here.
Okay, are you ready?
So, the next item of business this afternoon is the debate on the report titled "Post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria". This is Document 16246 presented by Ms Deborah BERGAMINI and Mr Yves CRUCHTEN on behalf of the Monitoring Committee.
And to finish by 6:35 p.m., I know it's tight, and we have some amendments to vote on, I will interrupt the list of speakers at 6:20 p.m. to allow time for the reply and the vote.
So, because Ms Deborah BERGAMINI is not here, Mr Yves CRUCHTEN will have seven minutes now. You don't have to use the whole seven minutes. The less you use, then we can have more speakers. And then you have three minutes at the end to reply.
Mr Yves CRUCHTEN, you have the floor.
Mr Yves CRUCHTEN
Luxembourg, SOC, Co-Rapporteur
17:59:09
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Dear colleagues,
As you heard, I have to excuse my colleague Ms Deborah BERGAMINI, who unfortunately can't be with us today. Allow me to thank her for her good and friendly co-operation, as well as the staff of the Assembly for their dedicated work on this report.
You may recall that in March 2024 the Monitoring Committee adopted a draft resolution and report on the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria, prepared together with our former colleague, Ms Thórhildur Sunna ÆVARSDÓTTIR. The rapporteur, then, recommended, and the Committee agreed, to close the dialogue.
Unfortunately Ms Thórhildur Sunna ÆVARSDÓTTIR could not finish the report and I was appointed to replace her.
The debate in the Assembly, scheduled for April 2024, was postponed following the announcement of snap parliamentary elections on 9th of June. As these elections did not lead to a government, another early election was held on 27 October. All in all, Bulgaria has held no less than seven elections in the past four years. In January 2025, finally a minority government under Prime Minister Rosen Dimitrov ZHELYAZKOV was formed.
Like the earlier version, the report today focuses on six outstanding areas of concern: the judiciary, the fight against high-level corruption, media freedom, minority rights, combatting hate speech, and violence against women.
Between 2015 and 2017, Bulgaria introduced reforms welcomed by the Council of Europe bodies, but key concerns persisted. The December 2023 constitutional reform aimed at resolving many of them by abolishing the plenary of the Supreme Judicial Council and creating two independent councils for judges and prosecutors.
However, in July 2024 the Constitutional Court ruled that most of these amendments required adoption by a Grand National Assembly and nearly 90% of them were repealed. This is regrettable, as the reforms would have aligned Bulgaria with European standards by reducing prosecutors’ influence and ensuring that most council members were elected by their peers.
Nonetheless, not all was lost. The removal of the Prosecutor’s Office’s power of "general supervision of legality" was upheld, as were the May 2023 provisions introducing accountability for the Prosecutor General. The government has also indicated that further reforms could be pursued through ordinary legislation.
In 2023, parliament adopted a new Anti-Corruption Law, strengthening institutions and creating a Commission for Illegal Assets Forfeiture. Additional steps included whistle-blower protection, procurement reforms, and a code of conduct for civil servants.
GRECO acknowledged progress but also highlighted serious shortcomings. In its Fifth Evaluation Round, only 7 out of 28 recommendations were fully implemented, while the response to high-profile corruption remains unsatisfactory. Scandals have led to the resignation of senior politicians, and public trust in institutions is still very low.
Since 2019, Bulgaria has made notable progress in media freedom. Reporters Without Borders ranked the country 70th in 2024, up from 111th five years ago. Criminal Code amendments have improved protection for journalists, and courts increasingly apply European human rights standards in defamation cases.
Yet challenges persist. Media ownership is highly concentrated and politically influenced, leaving independent voices under pressure. We are also concerned about the rising number of SLAPP lawsuits targeting journalists.
The authorities have taken steps to promote equality and inclusion. Nevertheless, the Roma, almost 5% of the population, continue to face poverty, inadequate housing, and forced evictions. More must be done to achieve tangible progress in the integration and inclusion of the Roma population. Housing and employment especially remain major concerns.
Another unresolved issue is linked to the rights of persons asserting a Macedonian ethnic consciousness. Despite repeated judgements of the European Court of Human Rights, associations representing these people continue to be refused registration. A working group was established in March 2024, but real progress is still needed.
Bulgaria has strengthened its response to hate speech. Amendments to the Criminal Code increased penalties for hate crimes, online monitoring has been expanded, and awareness programmes, including civic education in schools, have been introduced. Training for police and judges is ongoing.
Although Bulgaria has not ratified the Istanbul Convention, authorities have introduced measures to combat domestic violence. However, resources remain crucially insufficient. In particular, there are not enough shelters for victims. We strongly recommend increased funding to ensure adequate protection for those victims.
Overall, Bulgaria has made meaningful progress, although many challenges remain, particularly in the field of judicial reform, the fight against high-level corruption, and the inclusion of Roma people.
These reforms must also be viewed against the backdrop of political instability. Remember: the October 2024 election was the seventh in just over 4 years, reflecting a fragmented landscape with eight parties surpassing the electoral threshold. Despite this, the authorities have demonstrated commitment to European democratic standards. Their planned accession to the Eurozone on the first of January next year is further proof of this determination.
For all these reasons, our report proposes to close the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria, while continuing to closely follow unresolved issues through future periodic reviews.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:05:40
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you.
Now we will hear the speakers on behalf of political groups.
I start with you, Mr Ionuț-Marian STROE, on behalf of the Group of the European People's Party.
Mr Ionuț-Marian STROE
Romania, EPP/CD, Spokesperson for the group
18:05:50
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Chair,
Honourable President,
Esteemed colleagues,
When we look at Bulgaria today, we see a country that has taken significant steps to strengthen democracy, rule of law and of course, good governance.
The road has not always been easy, but the progress is real and deserves, of course, recognition.
The recent constitutional amendments and judicial reforms show a clear determination to modernise institutions and address long-standing concerns. These changes strengthen accountability and open the way to more transparent decision-making. Equally important is the adoption of the Anti-Corruption Act, granting enhanced investigative powers to independent bodies. No country can eliminate corruption overnight. Yet Bulgaria has demonstrated seriousness in building the tools to confront it.
We should also commend the constructive political will of the authorities and their readiness to work with European partners. This openness reflects a genuine commitment to belonging fully to the democratic family of nations. And when it comes to human rights, Bulgaria of course must implement the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
And of course, there are still more things which remain to be done to ensure that reforms are fully effective and irreversible. That is why our approach must combine encouragement, support and constructive dialogue.
In this period, we welcome the proposal to close the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria, while keeping a balanced follow-up on the remaining issues. Acknowledging Bulgaria's progress means reinforcing democracy not only in one state, but of course across our entire continent.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:07:47
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you so much and thank you for the time. On behalf of the European Conservatives, Patriots & Affiliates, Ms Atidzhe ALIEVA-VELI.
Ms Atidzhe ALIEVA-VELI
Bulgaria, ECPA, Spokesperson for the group
18:07:57
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mister President.
Dear colleagues,
On behalf of the European Conservatives, Patriots & Affiliates Group, I would like to express our full support for the conclusions of the rapporteurs to close the procedure for post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria.
It started in January 2000 and has lasted for 26 years until today. It's time to finalise this procedure, appreciating the progress achieved by Bulgaria. It refers to reforming the judiciary, ensuring media freedom and transparency of the ownership of media, free and fair electoral processes, etc.
The draft resolution presented by the Monitoring Committee reflects the significant results which have been achieved over the past several years. It should be underlined that during the period covered by the draft resolution, Bulgaria struggled to recover from the Covid-19 pandemic, like much of Europe, and was very heavily affected by the energy, economic and security fallout of the Russian aggression against Ukraine.
Despite these challenging circumstances, Bulgaria resolved a domestic political crisis entirely through the process within the democratic institutions, simultaneously advanced key reforms and greatly contributed to the security in our region.
We support the draft resolution, as well as the amendment proposed by the co-rapporteur. And colleagues, I invite you all to lend your support.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:09:39
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you so much.
Mr Mehmet AKALIN on behalf of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe.
Mr Mehmet AKALIN
Türkiye, ALDE, Spokesperson for the group
18:09:45
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Mister President,
Dear colleagues,
First of all, I must thank the rapporteurs for their intensive work.
I wish to raise some issues about the current challenges facing democracy, freedom and the rule of law in Bulgaria. Recent developments risk undermining public confidence in institutions and weakening democratic governance. The case of Blagomir KOTSEV, the elected Mayor of Varna, is emblematic. His detention has triggered large demonstrations and raised fears that judicial measures are being used as political instruments.
Beyond this, the Monitoring Report identifies wider issues. Despite reforms in 2023, subsequent court rulings rolled back progress, leaving judicial independence uncertain. Corruption remains a serious problem with very few high-level convictions.
On the other hand, human rights issues, minority organisations struggle for recognition and minority groups' protection remains incomplete. Turks are the largest minority group in Bulgaria, experiencing problems such as difficulties with bureaucracy, lack of resources and support in learning their mother tongue, racist attacks on religious places and hate speech on minorities, which goes unnoticed.
The Istanbul Convention is still unratified, despite strengthened domestic violence legislation.
There have been positive steps, however. Bulgaria has improved in the Press Freedom Index and introduced stronger legal protection for journalists. Yet concerns remain over concentrated media ownership, lack of transparency and disinformation that undermine pluralism.
Finally, dear colleagues, our role is not to condemn, but to support. I therefore suggest that this Parliamentary Assembly remain attentive and consider a fact-finding mission or independent review. Such actions will both provide clarity, and signal that Europe stands ready to help Bulgaria strengthen its institutions and uphold the rule of law.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:12:02
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Sorry to be a bit tough, but I want all colleagues to take the floor on this debate. It is a very crucial debate. I understand that both sides, or all sides, would like to speak. That's why I ask all of you to be within the limit of two minutes, even less if you can.
Mr George LOUCAIDES, the co-Chair of the Group of the Unified European Left.
Mr George LOUCAIDES
Cyprus, UEL, Spokesperson for the group
18:12:21
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mister President.
Today we are invited to take stock of Bulgaria's path under the post-monitoring dialogue.
It is right to acknowledge the determination of Bulgarian institutions and society to confront deep-rooted challenges. The measures to reinforce accountability of the prosecutor general, the establishment of a stronger anti-corruption body, new protections for victims of domestic violence and actions to counter hate speech are not symbolic gestures. They demonstrate resilience and a commitment to European standards, even in a period marked by political turbulence.
For these reasons, our group fully supports the proposal to close the post-monitoring dialogue.
Yet support must come with responsibility.
Bulgaria's reform agenda is far from complete. Judicial independence remains vulnerable after constitutional setbacks.
The fight against corruption has advanced on paper, but effective results in high-level cases are still awaited.
Marginalised Roma communities continue to face exclusion.
Long-pending Strasbourg judgments demand urgent execution.
Media pluralism is challenged by concentration of ownership and abusive litigation.
Therefore, closing post-monitoring cannot be seen as closure in substance. It must be understood as a transition to a new phase of co-operation based on trust, but also on vigilance.
We expect Bulgaria to preserve the gains achieved and to press forward where reforms are unfinished. Our Parliamentary Assembly should continue to follow developments closely, ensuring that setbacks do not undo hard won progress.
For us, in the Group of the Unified European Left, the standard is clear: democracy, human rights and social justice are not halfway goals.
Bulgaria has taken important steps forward. Now it must continue without hesitation until those commitments are fully realised.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:14:27
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mr George LOUCAIDES. Mr Stefan SCHENNACH on behalf of the Socialists, Democrats and Greens Group. Stefan.
Mr Stefan SCHENNACH
Austria, SOC, Spokesperson for the group
18:14:32
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mister President.
I was sceptical at first, but the rapporteur has convinced me that this move to end a post-monitoring procedure is appropriate in this case. After a series of elections, a political crisis and instability, the new coalition government has now actually taken action since the beginning of 2025 and demonstrated its seriousness, especially in the area of the judiciary.
In the area of periodic monitoring, however, we will still have to look at a few things in the future, in particular the five-year probationary periods for judges, the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) recommendations, where there are no convictions, but also the 90 unfulfilled recommendations of the European Court of Human Rights. Many are waiting, and especially the catastrophic situation of the Roma population, with the evictions, the demolition of houses, lack of education, lack of health and so on.
As a rapporteur here for SLAPPs, it should be noted that there is also work to be done in the media sector for the new government. Better protection for the journalists, to consider SLAPPs complaints and to make media concentration better and more transparent.
But in this sense - and I have every confidence in the two excellent rapporteurs here - we can and should do this post-monitoring and I support it.
The last post-monitoring, which I was able to complete as Chairman, was over ten years ago and that was Monaco, so all good things come to Bulgaria.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:16:42
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, dear Mr Stefan SCHENNACH.
Ms Bisera KOSTADINOVSKA-STOJCHEVSKA.
Ms Bisera KOSTADINOVSKA-STOJCHEVSKA
North Macedonia, SOC
18:16:50
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mister President.
First of all, allow me to thank the rapporteurs for the immense effort that they have put into producing this very important report.
Colleagues and friends,
My government recently received a letter of complaint from another government labelling my questions and enquiries into why member countries are not executing the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights as 'hate speech'.
If that is hate speech, I would like it to be noted that I will continue to ask and be loud on issues concerning respecting human rights around the world, and not just in this hemicycle.
I know that for some of you, dear colleagues, here inside, the only worry is counting the numbers and the votes. But for most of us, when we say yes, when we vote yes, it means that the country in question respects the human rights of all of its citizens. And no means that no, this country only piles on examples of not respecting the human rights in general of its own citizens, and yet strives to be perceived as the most exemplary student.
To respect human rights is not just on paper, but to do your best in practice and to strive to be better in every single way, in respecting people's choices.
Being a member of a bigger ideological family, though, gives a country an even bigger responsibility to look into the future and pave the way for everyone in that family and those who are striving to join, to give the opportunity, just as they themselves were given a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Are we always ready when given this opportunity? No. But do we seize it? Yes.
Having this process closed, Bulgaria needs to stop labelling and start working.
In the end, as we heard today, 'justice delayed is justice denied'.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:18:35
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Ms Bisera KOSTADINOVSKA-STOJCHEVSKA.
Ms Denitsa SACHEVA.
Ms Denitsa SACHEVA
Bulgaria, EPP/CD
18:18:39
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, President.
Distinguished members of the Parliamentary Assembly,
Bulgaria joined the Council of Europe in 1992, affirming its unwavering commitment to democracy, the rule of law, human rights and the principles of multilateralism and co-operation.
For the past 26 years, Bulgarian authorities have engaged actively and constructively in the post-monitoring dialogue with the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a process which I believe has fully achieved its purpose.
By the way, ladies and gentlemen, here with me is a colleague of mine who is just 27 years old, and he was born in the year when the post-monitoring procedure started, and he is now joining the Parliamentary Assembly.
Against this backdrop, I welcome the fact that the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) acknowledged Bulgaria's progress and recommended the closure of the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria with the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.
The draft resolution before us today is not only a recognition of our efforts, but is also an expression of trust in Bulgaria's democratic trajectory.
I would like to use the opportunity to sincerely thank our co-rapporteurs, Ms Deborah BERGAMINI and Mr Yves CRUCHTEN, and also to the previous one, Ms Thórhildur Sunna ÆVARSDÓTTIR, for their excellent work.
Ladies and gentlemen,
I sincerely hope that you will be able to lend your support to the proposed draft resolution and recognition of the significant progress of Bulgaria in the past two decades.
I reiterate the firm commitment of Bulgaria to contribute to a strong, stable and social Europe.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:20:10
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you. Thank you, Ms Denitsa SACHEVA.
Mr Didier MARIE, you are next.
Mr Didier MARIE
France, SOC
18:20:17
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you Mister Chairman,
Ladies and gentlemen,
I too would like to thank our co-rapporteurs for this very comprehensive report on the situation in Bulgaria.
Since 2021, the country has held seven legislative elections, with no party or coalition managing to win. Despite this political instability, Bulgaria has initiated a number of reforms. In 2023, for example, an anti-corruption law was passed to strengthen the investigative powers of the anti-corruption commission.
Similarly, a law on the protection of whistleblowers has made it possible to establish a comprehensive legal framework to simplify the reporting and protection of whistleblowers.
These advances testify to the solidity of Bulgaria's democratic institutions and the goodwill of the authorities. Significant progress has been made since Bulgaria joined our organisation in 1991 and the end of the full monitoring procedure in 2000. While we can now envisage closing the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria, certain points nevertheless remain a cause for concern, and will need to be closely monitored as part of the periodic reviews.
I am thinking first of all of the implementation of the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights. More than 90 of the Court's judgments concerning Bulgaria are still awaiting execution. The Bulgarian authorities need to co-operate with the Committee of Ministers to introduce the necessary reforms. Priority should be given to the execution of judgments aimed at combating the discrimination suffered in particular by Roma and people of Macedonian origin.
Furthermore, despite high-level corruption scandals, little progress has been made in securing the final conviction of politicians who have committed criminal offences.
I therefore encourage the Bulgarian authorities to implement all the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) recommendations.
Similarly, the issues of media concentration, media diversity and journalists' freedom of investigation are not being properly addressed. The authorities should take the necessary steps to ensure respect for pluralism.
With these reservations, I agree with the conclusions of the rapporteurs to close the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria.
Thank you very much.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:22:21
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mr Didier MARIE.
Ms Marija PETRUSHEVSKA.
Ms Marija PETRUSHEVSKA
North Macedonia, EPP/CD
18:22:25
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Distinguished President, Mesdames et messieurs.
Let me begin by thanking the rapporteur for this important report.
Bulgaria continues to refuse to implement the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
As highlighted in the report, there remain serious concerns regarding human rights, including those of the ethnic Macedonian minorities. Macedonians are not included in minority programmes, they receive no assistance and they have no representatives in consultative bodies.
Their language, literature, and history are not taught. They are prevented from establishing organisations to defend their rights.
Let me remind you that recognition as a "national minority" by Bulgaria is not a prerequisite for protection under the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities.
The major concern in this respect remains the non-execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, notably in the cases UMO Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria. For 18 years now, Bulgaria has refused to register this association.
The ethnic Macedonian minority and its organisations are a symbol of courage and of the democratic struggle for their most basic human rights.
Dear colleagues,
There is a Macedonian novel called "Pirej" by Petre M. ANDREEVSKI:
"You may pull it, uproot it, and try to destroy it, but it never dies. The moment it touches the earth again, it grows back, it lives, it rises. Nothing can destroy it."
I firmly believe that, regardless of the behaviour of the Bulgarian authorities, the ethnic Macedonian minority will always be reborn, will always rise, and will always endure.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:23:59
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Ms Marija PETRUSHEVSKA.
And the last speaker is Ms Nadejda IORDANOVA.
Ms Nadejda IORDANOVA
Bulgaria, NR
18:24:04
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mister President.
Dear colleagues,
Today we debate the closure of the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria not because this mechanism achieved its goals, but because after 26 years, it has become ineffective.
The report notes progress, yes. A difficult one, a fragile one. I took every step in this process. But it also makes clear how much remains unfinished. I will stress two issues that cut to the heart of democratic resilience: the rule of law and media freedom.
Bulgaria still struggles with judicial independence. The Supreme Judicial Council fails to meet international standards, and both it and the inspectorate have overstayed their mandate. This undermines justice and public trust. Our prosecution system is neither politically neutral nor accountable. For over two years, we have had a so-called temporary prosecutor general, an arrangement meant to bypass the rules and at a later stage secure a full mandate.
Since July, thousands of Bulgarians have protested against politically motivated repression. The arrest of the Varna Mayor is seen as part of the pattern. Opposition figures investigated, others ignored.
Finally, I shall put a word of alarm. The Council of Europe itself is struggling. Too often, we issue resolutions but fail to act. Too often, we compromise and excuse inaction. Each hesitation erodes our strength.
Colleagues,
This report marks the future challenge for Bulgaria. It is a cultural reform for this Council. It is a test of whether it truly defends our principles.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:26:12
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you Ms Nadejda IORDANOVA.
Does the co-rapporteur wish to reply? You have three minutes.
Mr Yves CRUCHTEN
Luxembourg, SOC, Co-Rapporteur
18:26:18
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mister Chair.
And also thank you all the colleagues that have taken the floor.
May I summarise what was just said?
Bulgaria is on the right track, but not all issues concerning human rights, democracy and the rule of law have been addressed to complete satisfaction.
Is everything perfect in Bulgaria? Absolutely not. This resolution and our report leave Bulgaria with some homework to complete.
Therefore, and I think many of you have pointed out the issues of concern... Therefore, the Parliamentary Assembly should keep a close eye on the developments in Bulgaria and continue to co-operate strongly with the Bulgarian authorities in their efforts to fulfil the necessary requirements.
Allow me, though, to congratulate Bulgaria on the progress achieved so far. I am convinced that working hand in hand with its neighbours and with us here at the Council of Europe, Bulgaria will continue to shape a bright, secure and prosperous future for all its citizens and the wider region.
Finally, after more than 25 years, let's close the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria today.
So please vote in favour of this resolution.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:27:41
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mr Yves CRUCHTEN.
Mr Mogens JENSEN, would you like to say a few words? We have three minutes.
Mr Mogens JENSEN
Denmark, SOC, Vice-Chairperson of the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee)
18:27:49
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Bulgaria joined the Council of Europe in 1992 and was under a full monitoring procedure until 2000.
In 2000, the Parliamentary Assembly decided to close the full monitoring procedure and engaged in a post-monitoring dialogue.
Since then, three reports have been submitted to the Parliamentary Assembly by the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) in 2010, in 2013 and 2019.
At its September meeting, the Monitoring Committee proposed now to close the post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria 25 years after the launching of the procedure.
We hope, of course, that all of you today will decide to support this decision, which would be a big step in strengthening this country's engagement in implementing our common European values.
Bulgaria has overcome the political crisis and instability illustrated by seven consecutive early parliamentary elections held between 2021 and 2024. It established a coalition government in January 2025. Since the last resolution on Bulgaria in the Assembly of 2019, major progress has been achieved as regards the six areas enumerated in the text.
We should welcome the reform of the criminal procedure code and the constitutional amendments limiting the power of the prosecutor's office and various measures taken to combat high-level corruption.
Bulgaria has also considerably improved its framework as regards freedom of expression and taken a number of measures to combat hate speech, violence against women and it has improved the situation of minorities.
To conclude, we commend the authorities' efforts made to take all necessary measures to finalise the post-monitoring dialogue. We look forward to very good co-operation in the future.
Nevertheless, as said by the rapporteur, the Committee should continue to follow the developments in the country in the framework of one of its forthcoming periodic reviews. As the rapporteur has rightly pointed out, there are a number of unresolved issues.
Thank you very much.
Vote: Post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:30:15
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mr Mogens JENSEN.
The debate is closed.
Dear colleagues,
The Monitoring Committee has presented a draft resolution in Document 16246, to which four amendments have been tabled.
They will be taken in the order in which they appear in the compendium. I remind you that speeches on amendments are limited to 30 seconds.
I understand that the Chairperson of the Committee wishes to propose to the Assembly that Amendments 2, 3 and 4 to the draft resolution, which were rejected by the Committee with a two-thirds majority, be declared as definitely rejected. Is that so? Good.
If no one objects, I will consider the amendments to be rejected. Is there an objection? No. The amendments are rejected.
I have received an oral amendment from the Committee, which reads as follows: "In paragraph 7, second sentence, delete the words 'by administrative courts'. The sentence as amended would therefore read as follows: "Following this reform, prosecutors' decisions not to open investigations into certain categories of criminal offences, including corruption-related offences, can be subject to judicial review".
The President may accept an oral amendment on the grounds of promoting clarity, accuracy or conciliation, and if there is no opposition from 10 or more members to it being debated. In my opinion, the oral amendment meets the criteria of Rule 34.7.a. Is there any opposition to the amendment being debated?
So, that is not the case.
I therefore call Mr Yves CRUCHTEN to support the oral amendment. You have 30 seconds. If you want, of course.
Mr Yves CRUCHTEN
Luxembourg, SOC, Co-Rapporteur
18:32:03
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Please support the amendment.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:32:07
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Does anyone wish to speak against the Oral Amendment? No?
I shall now put the Oral Amendment to the vote.
The vote is open.
The vote is closed.
I call for the result to be displayed.
The Oral Amendment is agreed.
I have received an Oral Amendment from the Committee which reads as follows:
'In paragraph 14, first sentence, replace the words "more than half" with the words "around one-third"'.
The sentence as amended would therefore read as follows:
'Over 90 leading judgments of the European Court of Human Rights concerning Bulgaria are pending implementation, with around one-third of them pending for at least 10 years.'
The President, as I've said earlier, may accept an Oral Amendment on the grounds of promoting clarity, accuracy, reconciliation, and if there is not a position from 10 or more members to it being debated.
In my opinion, the Oral Amendment meets the criteria of Rule 34.7, paragraph A.
Is there any opposition to the amendment being debated? That's not the case.
I therefore call Mr Yves CRUCHTEN to support the Oral Amendment.
You have 30 seconds.
Mr Yves CRUCHTEN
Luxembourg, SOC, Co-Rapporteur
18:33:39
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you, Mister President.
Facts are facts and they should be correct. So, please support this oral amendment.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:33:46
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Anyone who wishes to speak against? No. So I will put it to the vote.
The vote is open.
The vote is closed.
I call for the result to be displayed.
The oral amendment is agreed.
I understand that Ms Denitsa SACHEVA wishes to withdraw Amendment 1 in favour of an oral amendment of conciliation.
Is that so, Ms Denitsa SACHEVA?
Ms Denitsa SACHEVA
Bulgaria, EPP/CD
18:34:24
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Yes.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:34:25
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you.
So Amendment 1 is therefore withdrawn.
I have received an oral amendment from the Committee which reads as follows: "In the draft resolution, paragraph 14, second sentence, replace the words 'ethnic Macedonians' with the words 'persons asserting a Macedonian ethnic consciousness'." The relevant phrase, as amended, would therefore read "and refusals to register associations of persons asserting a Macedonian ethnic consciousness".
In my opinion, the oral amendment meets the criteria of Rule 34.7, paragraph A. Any opposition to this amendment?
That's not the case. I therefore call Mr Yves CRUCHTEN to support it.
Mr Yves CRUCHTEN
Luxembourg, SOC, Co-Rapporteur
18:35:21
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
By this amendment, we take over the wording, the exact wording of the court in their judgment, and this paragraph is about the court's judgment. So please support this amendment.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:35:33
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Thank you Mr Yves CRUCHTEN.
Does anyone wish to speak against the oral amendment? No.
I shall now put the oral amendment to the vote.
The vote is open.
The vote is closed.
I call for the result to be displayed.
The oral amendment is agreed.
I have received another oral amendment from the Committee, which reads as follows: 'In the draft resolution, paragraph 19, second sentence, replace the words "criminal code" with the words "law and protection from domestic violence"'.
The sentence as amended would therefore read as follows:
'It commends Bulgaria in particular for the adoption in July 2023 of the amendments to the law and protection from domestic violence, which cover the protection of victims of domestic violence from an early stage, irrespective of the illegal status of their relationship.'
In my opinion, the oral amendment meets the criteria of Rule 34.7, paragraph A.
Any opposition to this amendment? That is not the case.
We will therefore proceed to the next amendment. You have to support it.
Mr Yves CRUCHTEN
Luxembourg, SOC
18:36:56
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Of course I support this oral amendment. We have a law. The law has a name. And then also let's name that law.
Thank you.
Mr Theodoros ROUSOPOULOS
Greece, EPP/CD, President of the Assembly
18:37:04
Video EN | OV
Print intervention
Okay. Does anyone wish to speak against? I will put it to vote.
The vote is open.
The vote is closed.
I call for the result to be displayed. The Oral Amendment is agreed.
We will now proceed to vote on the draft resolution contained in document 16246, as amended. A simple majority is required.
The vote is open.
The vote is closed.
I call for the result to be displayed. The draft resolution in document 16246, as amended, is adopted.
Предложените поправки:
1 October 2025
Tabled by Ms Marija PETRUSHEVSKA, Ms Bisera KOSTADINOVSKA-STOJCHEVSKA, Mr Bekim KJOKU, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Albana VOKSHI, Ms Jorida TABAKU, Ms Filiz POLAT
In the draft resolution, paragraph 14, second sentence, replace the words "calls on the authorities" with the following words:
"urges the Bulgarian authorities to implement these leading judgments and calls on them"
Explanatory note
Bulgaria is holding a leading place amongst countries not implementing the ECHR judgments as a member of Council of Europe, i.e PACE - nearly 20 years for some cases such as the one concerning UMO Ilinden, the ethnic Macedonian association.
01 October 2025
Tabled by Ms Marija PETRUSHEVSKA, Ms Bisera KOSTADINOVSKA-STOJCHEVSKA, Mr Bekim KJOKU, Ms Nađa LAKOVIĆ, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Mr Branislav BORENOVIĆ, Ms Jorida TABAKU, Mr Christophe LACROIX
In the draft resolution, after paragraph 17, insert the following paragraph:
"The Assembly recalls that recognition by the State as a "national minority" is not a prerequisite for qualification for protection under the Framework Convention."
Explanatory note
Though Bulgaria do not recognize existence of Macedonian minority and their human rights, it does not released them from the obligation to respect the Framework convention for protection of national minorities.
01 October 2025
Tabled by Ms Marija PETRUSHEVSKA, Ms Bisera KOSTADINOVSKA-STOJCHEVSKA, Mr Bekim KJOKU, Ms Nađa LAKOVIĆ, Ms Elvira KOVÁCS, Ms Biljana PANTIĆ PILJA, Ms Jorida TABAKU, Mr Jan Filip LIBICKI
In the draft resolution, after paragraph 17, insert the following paragraphs:
"The Assembly remains concerned about the fragile situation of the ethnic Macedonian minority in Bulgaria. The Macedonian ethnic minority are not recognised by the authorities as a ‘national minority’ under the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (ETS No. 157) (ratified by Bulgaria in 1999), and in addition, the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the refusal to register associations of ethnic Macedonians (UMO Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria) have not been implemented. The Assembly urges the Bulgarian authorities to pursue their efforts to achieve tangible progress in the recognition and integration of the ethnic Macedonian minority in Bulgaria and implementation of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in relation to this minority."
Explanatory note
The amendment its addressing the longstanding issue of not respecting the human right of the ethnic Macedonian minority in Bulgaria as well the no implementation of the ECRH judgments for 18 years related with the case UMO Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria.
01 October 2025
Tabled by Ms Denitsa SACHEVA, Mr Ilian IONTCHEV, Mr Krasimir YORDANOV, Mr Kostadin ANGELOV, Ms Atidzhe ALIEVA-VELI, Mr Toshko YORDANOV, Ms Nadejda IORDANOVA, Mr Mihail MITOV
In the draft resolution, paragraph 14, second sentence, replace the words after "as regards cases" with the following words:
"related to the following Articles of the European Convention on Human Rights (ETS No.5): Article 3 – prohibition of torture (S.Z. v. Bulgaria); Articles 2 and 5 – right to life and right to liberty and security (Kolevi v. Bulgaria); Articles 6, 10 and 18 - right to a fair trial, right to freedom of expression and limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Miroslava Todorova v. Bulgaria); Article 8 – right to respect for private and family life (Yordanova and Others v. Bulgaria); and Article 11 – freedom of assembly and association (UMO Ilinden and Others v. Bulgaria and similar cases)."
Видео на дебатите в цялата следобедна сесия на Асамблеята
(не само на точката за България) :
https://vodmanager.coe.int/coe/webcast/coe/2025-10-01-2/en
Vote on Resolution - Doc. 16246
Post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria
Assembly's voting results
101 in favor 3 against 1 abstention
All participants in the vote
Votes on texts and amendments
Post-monitoring dialogue with Bulgaria: Doc. 16246
- 01/10/2025 - Amendment 1
- 01/10/2025 - Amendment 2
- 01/10/2025 - Amendment 3
- 01/10/2025 - Amendment 4
- 01/10/2025 - Oral Amendment
- 01/10/2025 - Oral Amendment
- 01/10/2025 - Oral Amendment
- 01/10/2025 - Oral Amendment
